Interesting op-ed from the New York Times on the recent student protest during a talk by Christina Hoff Sommers at Lewis & Clark Law School. As the author points out, the current political moment is fraught and toxic, which can make people “jumpy” when it comes to certain topics. Extreme rhetoric begets more extreme rhetoric, as we attempt to set baselines for what is normal and acceptable.

I have not been present for any of these confrontations between speakers and students. I have been wondering whether and how I would do anything if I had been present. Uncivil dialogue and fractious disagreements apparently are becoming commonplace, and as someone who wants to be helpful/effective in the dialogue space, I feel like I should be ready to jump in. But I’m not sure what that looks like, and I feel worried about self-aggrandizing behavior on my part. And what about my own feelings on the matter? Do I put those aside, or integrate them somehow into my response?

With all this in mind, I would very much value hearing from ADR professors who have seen first-hand these confrontations, like those between student protesters and controversial speakers. How did you react? If you did “intervene,” do you think it was effective? Do ADR people have special/extra responsibility to respond when these things happen, or to prevent these kinds of things from happening? If so, what does that look like — before, in the moment, and afterward? Do we set ground rules before people come to talk, for example? Or is even the idea of “setting ground rules” and thus deciding in advance that the speaker gets to speak rife with assumptions that work to reify existing and undesirable power disparities?

Part of the reason I’m thinking about this is that I have been reflecting on an incident that happened at the University of Oregon two years ago. One of our professors wore blackface at a Halloween party. My response consisted of signing an open letter calling for her resignation; attending some student forums and listening to students talk; speaking with my classes and with students who came to my office; and giving a short talk on this experience to another student forum on diversity a few months later. I did not feel (and still don’t) like I did enough. Was there more I could have done, in terms of promoting dialogue and community? Although this is not the same as intervening in a student protest, it raises some of the same issues.

So I am searching for examples of people who have contributed productively in these kinds of uncontained, unplanned spaces. If you have examples or stories — or if you have ideas or theories about what might work — feel free to post in comments or write me directly (jwr at uoregon.edu). Thank you!

Jennifer Reynolds is an Assistant Professor at the University of Oregon Law and the Faculty Director of the ADR Center. Teaching civil procedure, conflicts of law, negotiation, and mediation, her research interests include dispute systems design, problem-solving in multiparty scenarios, judicial attitudes toward ADR, and cultural influences and implications of alternative processes. She is also a contributor to ADR Prof Blog.